Home » 2009 » October » 2 » "The method of free interpretation: as in Russia have made a guilty Georgia

---

16:36 "The method of free interpretation: as in Russia have made a guilty Georgia

International Commission of Inquiry led by Swiss diplomat Heidi Tagliavini ( "Commission Tagliavini"), worked under the auspices of the EU, zakonchilaitogovy report on the causes and perpetrators of the conflict in August 2008. International Commission of Inquiry led by Swiss diplomat Heidi Tagliavini ( "Commission Tagliavini"), worked under the auspices of the EU, has finished the final report on the causes and perpetrators of the conflict in August 2008. The report was handed over to Heidi Tagliavini, yesterday in Brussels, representatives of Russia, Georgia, EU, OSCE and UN. Russia has struck urgency. Almost immediately after the presentation of its representatives in Brussels on the report, Russia's media began to comment on it. Permanent Representative of Russia to the EU Vladimir Chizhov, immediately made a statement which is then dispersed to various interpretations of Russia's information space. In particular, as reported by RIA Novosti, Mr Chizhov said that "an independent international panel called Saakashvili regime responsible for the outbreak of conflict in South Caucasus". On Wednesday, the Internet and on TV, and on Thursday and the Russian newspaper headlines and it started: "Georgia is responsible for the conflict," "At the outbreak of the conflict to blame Georgia," "The mission is made of truth: Europe has recognized Georgia as aggressor," In initiating conflict in the Caucasus in August last year, is guilty of Georgia "... As usual, Russia's vision of the mass taken up and many of the Ukrainian media, accusing Georgia of "unleashing the conflict." This again confirmed the fact that many Ukrainian journalists "get their" information from the Russian colleagues, without their own investigations. Although one could at least examine the Georgian mass media - the more so because there are a lot of Georgia's information resources in Russian. Surprisingly, the Foreign Ministry put on its website an official comment (of course, with the same "withdrawal") in a couple of hours after the presentation of the report - when he and then to Moscow, he reached (electronic version was brought to the public only yesterday evening, at 18.00 Kiev time). The report - 900 pages. Examine them for several minutes, as it managed to make Mr Chizhov, impossible. Well, how could get it and read a couple of hours in the Foreign Ministry and gentlemen sitting in Moscow - is unknown. Nevertheless, the car was running. Here's the commentary Foreign Ministry said: "In our opinion, the EU Commission's efforts were not wasted - any thinking person will take away from Sept. 30 report, made public the core conclusion is that the aggression against South Ossetia on the night of August 8, 2008 unleashed the current leadership of Georgia. Ultimately, this is the main result of the "Commission Tagliavini. But Russia's media broadcast the words head of the department of disarmament and conflict resolution of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations Alexander Pikayev: "Report of the independent international commission which called Saakashvili's regime responsible for the outbreak of conflict in the southern Caucasus in August 2008 did not radically affect the attitude of European countries to Russia's actions in this conflict. " The expert concludes: "Of course, this conclusion the Commission said that the truth has triumphed. The only indisputable fact of this report, that Georgia started the war, and allegations about Russia - it is a matter of interpretation. In general, it can be considered a great victory. " And so on. Comments set, meaning one. The problem is that nowhere in the report of the Commission Tagliavini "not alleged that Georgia attacked first, on the Georgian side and focus immediate attention. Immediately following statements Chizhov representative of Georgia to the EU Salome Samadashvili expressed disagreement with interpretations that are presented to reporters of Russia's colleague. "Assessment and interpretation of Ambassador Vladimir Chizhov was incorrect," - she said. (Clearly, Russia's mass media ignored this statement, but for some reason, and also received a number of Ukrainian media). Famous Georgian resource "Georgia-Online", followed by Russia's agency, gave a selection of comments by the Georgian side on this issue. "Nowhere in the report of the EU to establish the causes of the outbreak of armed conflict in August last year, no mention that Georgia started the war and all the interpretations on this subject are full of lies", - stated, inter alia, a spokesman for the Georgian government, Deputy Prime Minister, State Minister for Reintegration State Minister. "In any case, the document calls for a more thorough study, but it does not say that Georgia started the war", - said the representative of Georgia in the EU Salome Samadashvili. Here are some statements by representatives of Tbilisi: "This report indicates that Russia had no right to interfere in Georgia under the pretext of protection of their so-called citizens and is the certification, which was carried out, was illegal. Also clearly stated that there is no evidence that the Georgian side has fired on Russian peacekeepers, respectively, used by the Russians all three arguments are not true, or simply a lie. " "The report clearly stated that Russia recognized the separatists and has provided them with military and political assistance. Is also said that was carried etnochistka Georgians and the Ossetians do not. " "Russia had no right to conduct military operations in the Kodori Gorge. In conclusion emphasizes that the Kodori Gorge was not included in the security zone, and the invasion there Russia had violated the conditions of the Moscow Agreement. In addition, the Opinion states that it was an international conflict between Georgia and Russia. " "The Commission has not demonstrated that in Tskhinvali was genocide of Ossetians, the Georgian side had attacked Russian peacekeepers, that was not the murder of citizens of Russia, the reasons why the attack on Georgia was not." However, the Kremlin does and does not claim that the Commission was accused of unleashing the conflict to Georgia. It's just a "core conclusion", which, according to Moscow, should learn from the report "any thinking person." That is the wine of Georgia - is a matter of interpretation. That's all. Initially, Russia's journalists have put into the mouth of Mr. Chizhov accusation Georgia for starting the conflict. In fact, Chizhov expressed differently. "Who started it? On this question the report provides an unequivocal answer, "- he said. "It was an attack by Georgian forces on the orders of Saakashvili on Tskhinvali on the night of 7 to 8 August and marked the beginning of large-scale hostilities and the transition of the armed conflict in the stage," - said Chizhov, replying to RIA Novosti. "Georgia started the conflict" and "Georgia is to blame for the conflict" - a great difference? Differences in these two statements, according to Russian media, the official representatives of the Kremlin and many Russian experts and analysts, no. But pay attention to the general conclusion of the commission, though in Russia's interpretation: Georgia started the war, but after months of provocation of Russia. That is, this war has provoked and, therefore, guilty of untying it, namely Russia (in Moscow, no one objected to some fault in the statement of Russia for the provocation of conflict, therefore, agree with that). And to answer the question: "the beginning of the conflict" and "provoked the conflict" - is one and the same? So, given that truth is always in the middle, and consider the views of Russia and Georgian sides, we come inevitably to the wording: The conflict began Georgia, but to provoke it RUSSIA. Incidentally, it was so filed conclusion "of the Commission Tagliavini" Western media. For example, Bi-Bi-Si. And, obviously, is to interpret it so we should listen. True, Russia is not in the least recognized and, obviously, will never admit their wrong. So, in her understanding, "South Ossetian scenario" is faithful and just. And here is worth thinking about Ukraine, including, and its reporters cram Ukrainians and frank interpretation of the fable, invented in Moscow.

1 2 3 4 5 Category: Ukraine | Views: 644 | Added by: magictr | Tags: Russia, interpretation | Rating: 0.0/0

Total comments: 0